The problems of forest and land fires continue to overshadow in Riau Province and Pelalawan District including the contributors of fire spots of forest and land fires. The handling and control of forest and land fires run during this time tend to be incidental and focus on the aspect of fire suppression only. The extinguishing and controlling of forest and land fires fire has been undertaken by several agencies in the local government organization of Pelalawan District. While the relationship between the agencies is more information share and informational relationship and the deployment of resource assistance is limited to the capacity of each organization during the occurrence of forest and land fires only, not led to a collaborative multi-disciplinary working approach (inter-organizational collaborative network) in the area of local government. This research aims to Described the management situation of forest and land fires that took place in Pelalawan District, conducting analysis and academic studies on the practice of Network Inter-Organization by controlling forest and land fires (Karhutla) in Pelalawan District, and formulating model Inter-organizational network-based organizations that can be applied to regional government of Pelalawan District in every bureaucracy organizations. The study used a qualitative descriptive approach with reference to literature studies and interview reluct collection by (Agranoff i McGuire, 2003).
Agranoff, R. (2007). *Managing within networks: Adding value to public organizations*.
Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Inside the matrix: Integrating the paradigms of intergovernmental and network management. *International Journal of Public Administration, 26*(12, 1401–1422. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD120024403
Baker, W. E. (2015). *The Network Organization in Theory and Practice*. Classics of Organization Theory, 401.
Berry, F. S., Brower, R. S., Choi, S. O., Goa, W. X., Jang, H., Kwon, M., & Word, J. (2004). Three Traditions of Network Research: What the Public Management Research Agenda Can Learn from Other Research Communities. Public Administration Review, 64(5), 539–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00402.x
Burstein, P., Laumann, E. O., & Knoke, D. (1990). The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains. Social Forces, 69(1), 289. https://doi.org/10.2307/2579627
Business Process Change. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/c2013-0-15339-1
Cohen, S. (2006). Governing by network: The new shape of the public sector. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(1), 232–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20165
Collaborative public management: new strategies for local governments. (2003). Choice Reviews Online, 41(02), 41-1215-41–1215. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41-1215
DIEFENBACH, T. (2009). NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT IN PUBLIC SECTOR ORGANIZATIONS: THE DARK SIDES OF MANAGERIALISTIC ‘ENLIGHTENMENT.’ Public Administration, 87(4), 892–909. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01766.x
Goldsmith, S., & Eggers, W. D. (2004). *The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal*. The Innovation Journal, 14(2), 6.
Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. *Administrative Science Quarterly, 44*(1, 82–111.
Isett, K. R., Mergel, I. A., LeRoux, K., Mischen, P. A., & Rethemeyer, R. K. (2011). Networks in Public Administration Scholarship: Understanding Where We Are and Where We Need to Go. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Supplement 1), i157–i173. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq061
Keast, R., Mandell, M., & Brown, K. (2006). Mixing state, market and network governance modes: the role of government in “Crowded” policy domains. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, 9(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijotb-09-01-2006-b002
KENIS, P., & PROVAN, K. G. (2009). TOWARDS AN EXOGENOUS THEORY OF PUBLIC NETWORK PERFORMANCE. Public Administration, 87(3), 440–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01775.x
Kingdon, J. (1993). How do Issues Get on Public Policy Agendas? In Sociology and the Public Agenda (pp. 40–50). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483325484.n3
Klijn, E. (2007). Managing complexity: Achieving the impossible? Critical Policy Studies, 1(3), 252–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2007.9518522
Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (n.d.). Governance Networks in the Public Sector. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887098
Koppenjan, J. F. M., Koppenjan, J., & Klijn, E. H. (2004). *Managing uncertainties in networks: A network approach to problem solving and decision making*.
Mandell, M. P. (1999). COMMUNITY COLLABORATIONS: Review of Policy Research, 16(1), 42–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1999.tb00840.x
McGUIRE, M., & AGRANOFF, R. (2011). THE LIMITATIONS OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT NETWORKS. Public Administration, 89(2), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01917.x
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). *Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook*.
Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. (2003). Managing the hollow state Collaboration and contracting. Public Management Review, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461667022000028834
No, U.-U. (2004). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 33 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Daerah.
Pratikno, P. (2015). Governance dan Krisis Teori Organisasi. *JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik, 11*(2, 121–138.
Raab, J., Lemaire, R. H., & Provan, K. G. (2013). Chapter 10 The Configurational Approach in Organizational Network Research. In Research in the Sociology of Organizations (pp. 225–253). https://doi.org/10.1108/s0733-558x(2013)0000038014
Rhodes, R. A. W. (2007). Understanding Governance: Ten Years On. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1243–1264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607076586
Scott, C., & Hofmeyer, A. (2007). Networks and social capital: a relational approach to primary healthcare reform. Health Research Policy and Systems, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-5-9
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2007). Studying Local Network Exclusion through Observation and Diaries. In Methods in Democratic Network Governance (pp. 148–178). https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627468_7
Sukrismanto, E., Alikodra, H. S., Saharjo, B. H., & Kardono, P. (2011). HUBUNGAN ANTAR ORGANISASI DALAM SISTEM PENGORGANISASIAN PENGENDALIAN KEBAKARAN HUTAN/LAHAN DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Penelitian Hutan Tanaman, 8(3), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.20886/jpht.2011.8.3.169-177
Ulrich, D. (1997). Measuring human resources: An overview of practice and a prescription for results. *Human Resource Management, 36*(3, 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-050x(199723)36:3
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
