The ACE-R is a widely accepted instrument in clinical practice, the revisions of which have been overcome certain weaknesses. The aim of this paper was to present the results of the ACE-R test research, and to analyze and compare the results obtained in the work with a healthy subject and a clinical subject diagnosis. The respondents are of similar age and similar characteristics. Selected from the clinical population is a respondent with a diagnosis of depression after a stroke, which is the most common a complication of the same. The results obtained in this paper partially confirmed the results of the previous ones research. The application of the mentioned test showed that the two respondents differed in their views measured abilities: the subject with a diagnosis of depression produces difficulties in recognizing tasks material, and verbal fluency and visuospatial abilities are reduced compared to healthy the respondent.
A.J, L. (2007). Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (ACE) for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of dementia. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 109, 491–494.
A.J., L., & Mitchell, A. J. (2013). A meta-analysis of the accuracy of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (ACE) and the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) in the detection of dementia. International Psychogeriatrics, 26(4), 555–563.
Cerovec, N. (2020). Povezanost depresije i moždanog udara. In Završni rad. Sveučilište u Rijeci: Fakultet zdravstvenih studija.
Hama, S., Yamashita, H., Shigenobu, M., Watanabe, A., Hiramoto, K., Kurisu, K., Yamawaki, S., & Kitaoka, T. (2007). Depression or apathy and functional recovery after stroke. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 22(10), 1046–1051.
Henry, J. D., & Crawford, J. R. (2004). A meta-analytic review of verbal fluency performance in patients with traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology, 18(4), 621–628.
Iris, Z., Trošt-Bobić, T., D., C., & Bašić-Kes, V. (2017). Tjelesna aktivnost i depresija nakon moždanog udara. Hrvatsko Športskomed, Vjesn, 32, 72–75.
Mathuranath, P. S., Nestor, P. J., Berrios, G. E., Rakowicz, W., & Hodges, J. R. (2000). A brief cognitive test battery to differentiate Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. Neurology, 55, 1613–1620.
Mihaljević-Peleš, A. (2022). Psihički poremećaji i moždani udar. In Sveučilište u Zagrebu: Medicinski fakultet.
Mioshi, E., Dawson, K., Mitchell, J., Arnold, R., & Hodges, J. R. (2006). The Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE-R): a brief cognitive test battery for dementia screening. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21, 1078–1085.
Ostir, G. V., K.S., M., Peek, M. K., & Goodwin, J. S. (2001). The association between emotional well-being and the incidence of stroke in older adults. Psychosom Med, 63, 210–215.
Pavlović, D. M. (1999). Dijagnostički testovi u neuropsihologiji.
Pavlović, D. M. (2002). Depresija i demencija. Engrami, 24(3–4), 63–80.
Radanović-Grgurić, L. (2008). Depresija i moždani udar. Anali Zavoda za znanstveni i umjetnički rad u Osijeku.
Ritman, T., Hughes, E. L., Regenthal, R., Robbins, J., & Rowe, B. (2015). Improving response inhibition systems in frontotemporal dementia with citalopram. Brain, 138(7), 1961–1975.
Rotomskis, A., Margevičiūtė, R., Germanavičius, A., Kaubrys, G., Budrys, V., & Bagdonas, A. (2005). Differential diagnosis of depression and Alzheimer’s disease with the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R. BMC Neurol, 15.
Salak-Đokić, B. B. (2018). Prediktivna vrednost odabranih neuropsiholoških testova u dijagnostici blagog kognitivnog poremećaja i demencije. Univerzitet u Beogradu: Medicinski Fakultet.
Todorović, T. (2024). Rezultati primjene Addenbrooke’s revidiranog testa kognitivne procjene: komparacija dva prikaza slučaja. STED Journal, 6(2), 53–63.
Totić-Poznanović, S., Marinković, D., Pavlović, D., & Paunović, V. R. (2005). Neuropsihološki profil bolesnika sa bipolarnom depresijom u remisiji. Vojnosanitski Pregled, 62(7–8), 543 550.
Tršinski, D., & Bakran, Ž. (2011). Test fonemske verbalne fluentnosti “FAS” kod bolesnika s traumatskom ozljedom mozga. Med Vjesn, 43(1–4), 11–18.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
