COLLABORATION IN DISASTER RISK REDUCTION OF MOUNT MERAPI IN SLEMAN

Muhammad Mustofa ,
Muhammad Mustofa
Contact Muhammad Mustofa

Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Diponegoro University , Semarang , Indonesia

Sri Suwitri ,
Sri Suwitri

Jl. Kapten Suparman No.39, Tuguran, Potrobangsan, Kec. Magelang Utara, Kota Magelang, Jawa Tengah 56116 Indonesia

Endang Larasati ,
Endang Larasati

Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Diponegoro University , Semarang , Indonesia

Tri Yuniningsih
Tri Yuniningsih

Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Diponegoro University , Semarang , Indonesia

Received: 14.01.2022.

Accepted: 14.05.2022. >>

Published: 30.05.2022.

Volume 4, Issue 1 (2022)

pp. 83-96;

https://doi.org/10.7251/STED2201083M

Abstract

The main focus of disaster management is currently on disaster risk reduction activities. Mount Merapi in Indonesia is one of the most active volcanoes in the world with a four-year eruption cycle. The local government of the Sleman Regency has made several efforts to reduce the risk of impacts from the eruption of Mount Merapi. These efforts involve various elements in society. The purpose of this research is to identify the efforts made by the Sleman Regency Government in reducing the risk of the eruption of Mount Merapi and the factors that influence it. This research uses descriptive qualitative research methods with informants coming from the government, volunteers and the community. The findings of this study are the activity of risk reduction of eruption Merapi Mount in Sleman consists of physical and non-physical mitigation. Physical mitigation includes the construction of the Merapi Sabodam, construction of the Early Warning System, determination of evacuation routes and construction of refugee shelters. Non-physical mitigation includes the preparation of a contingency plan for the eruption of Mount Merapi, the formation of Destana (Disaster Resilient Village), the sister village and sister school program, the establishment of a disaster safe education unit, the establishment of the Operational Unit and the Implementing Unit for disaster management. The program is run by the government along with non-state actors to be affected by the starting conditions of each party, ability to combine the resources owned by each party, to shared information and commitment to a common purpose.

Keywords

References

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. *Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18*(4, 543–571.
Balgos, B., Gaillard, J. C., & Sanz, K. (2012). The warias of Indonesia in disaster risk reduction: the case of the 2010 Mt Merapi eruption in Indonesia. *Gender & Development, 20*(2, 337–348.
Breyer, S., Donahue, J. D., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2011). *Collaborative Governance: Private Roles for Public Goals in Turbulent Times*.
Buchari, A., Santoso, M. B., & Marlina, N. (2017). Pengembangan kapasitas kelembagaan desa tangguh bencana di Kabupaten Garut (studi kasus di desa Pasawahan Kecamatan Tarogong Kaler. *JAKPP (Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan & Pelayanan Publik, 3*(1, 49–62.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). *Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches*.

Citation

Copyright

All papers are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Abstracting & Indexing *****