The term "lifestyle" is a central concept of Adler's theory of personality, which he defines as a characteristic pattern of behavior that is a manifestation of a unique way of perceiving, conceptualizing, behaving and personal striving towards a goal that is filled with subjective meaning and represents part of the striving for power (Croake, 1975). Personality traits represent dimensions of individual differences that relate to a person's tendency to exhibit consistent patterns of thought, feeling, and action (McCrae & Costa, 1985). The research sample consisted of a total of 211 respondents, mostly students of the University of East Sarajevo surveyed via online questionnaires, of which 135 were female and 76 were male. Measuring instruments with satisfactory measurement characteristics were used: Questionnaire for examining the Big Five personality model (Goldberg, 1992), a modified version of the Allport-Vernon-Lindzis value scale for measuring lifestyles, a Scale for examining the sociodemographic characteristics of the respondents, and a Scale for examining academic performance. The obtained data show that of all personality dimensions of the Big Five model, only conscientiousness has a statistically significantly positive correlation with achieved academic success expressed through the average grade in studies (r=.24), which is not surprising, because this is a trait that is consistently associated with academic and business success in a large number of studies. Four lifestyle styles statistically significantly correlate with achieved academic success: family-sentimental style (r=.15), cognitive style (r=0.16), popularity-oriented style (r=-.19) and Promethean activism (r=.15). Although none of the mentioned correlations are high, they indicate the undoubted existence of a connection between these constructs and the role that lifestyles as complex systems of values, goals, attitudes and beliefs play in determining the final forms of behavior and achieved results within the educational system.
Conceptualization, S.S. and N.P.; Data curation, S.S. and N.P.; Formal Analysis, S.S.; Investigation, S.S. and N.P.; Methodology, S.S. and N.P.; Writing – original draft, S.S. and N.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
References
Alegría-Torres, J. A., Baccarelli, A., & Bollati, V. (2011). Epigenetics and Lifestyle. Epigenomics, 3(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.2217/epi.11.22
Cachia, M., Lynam, S., & Stock, R. (2018). Academic success: Is it just about the grades? Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), 434–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2018.1462096
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2003). Personality predicts academic performance: Evidence from two longitudinal university samples. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(4), 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00578-0
Croake, J. (1975). An Adlerian view of life style. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 3, 513–518.
Eisenberg, D., Golberstein, E., & Hunt, J. B. (2009). Mental Health and Academic Success in College. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.2191
Furnham, A., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Mcdougall, F. (2003). Personality, cognitive ability, and beliefs about intelligence as predictors of academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 1, 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2003.08.00
Furnham, A., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2004). Personality and intelligence as predictors of statistics examination grades. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 943–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.10.01
Gentry, J., Winer, J., Sigelman, C., & Phillips, F. (1980). Adlerian lifestyle and vocational preference. Journal of Individual Psychology, 1, 80–87.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26
Hakimi, S., Hejazi, E., & Lavasani, M. (2011). The relationships between personality traits and students’ academic achievement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 836–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11
Hol, S., & Lindzi, G. (1983). Teorije ličnosti. Beograd: Nolit.
Jensen, M. (2007). Defining lifestyle. Environmental Sciences, 2, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15693430701472
John, O., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. 102–138.
Knežević, T. (2016). Odnos profesionalnog životnog stila zaposlenih i stila upravljanja organizacijom. Neobjavljena doktorska disertacija, Fakultet tehničkih nauka. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. Guilford Press., 102–138.
Komarraju, M., Karau, S., Schmeck, R., & Avdic, A. (2011). The Big Five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 472–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.01
Larsen, R., & Buss, D. (2008). Psihologija ličnosti. . Jastrebarsko: Naklada Slap.
Letić, M. M., & Lungulov, B. S. (2017). SOCIO-DEMOGRAFSKI ČINIOCI USPEŠNOSTI DAROVITIH UČENIKA. Годишњак Филозофског Факултета у Новом Саду, 41(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.19090/gff.2016.2.215-232
Luković, S., & Čizmić, S. (2012). Povezanost preferencija životnih stilova i profesionalnih interesovanja petnaestogodišnjaka. Primenjena Psihologija, 5(1), 81–108. https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2012.1.81-108
McCarty, D. L., & Christian, D. D. (2019). Using an Adventure Therapy Activity to Assess the Adlerian Lifestyle. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 15(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2019.1697405
Mccrae, R., & Costa, P. (1985). Openness to experience. Perspectives in Personality, 1, 145–172.
O’connor, M., & Paunonen, S. (2007). Big Five personality predictors of postsecondary academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 971–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.01
Rimfeld, K., Kovas, Y., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2016). True grit and genetics: Predicting academic achievement from personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), 780–789. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000089
Roberts, B., Kuncel, N., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., Goldberg, L., Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S., & Knafo, A. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 789–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047
Smederevac, S., & Mitrović, D. (2006). Ličnostmetode i modeli. Beograd: Društvo Psihologa Srbije.
Stoltz, K. B., Wolff, L. A., Monroe, A. E., Farris, H. R., & Mazahreh, L. G. (2013). Adlerian Lifestyle, Stress Coping, and Career Adaptability: Relationships and Dimensions. The Career Development Quarterly, 61(3), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2013.00049.x
Tok, S., & Morali, S. (2009). Trait emotional intelligence, the big five personality dimensions and academic success in physical education teacher candidates. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 7, 921–931. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.7.92
Trapmann, S., Hell, B., Hirn, J.-O. W., & Schuler, H. (2007). Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between the Big Five and Academic Success at University. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 215(2), 132–151. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.215.2.132
Watts, R. (2015). Adler’s Individual Psychology: The Original Positive Psychology. Revista de Psicoterapia, 102, 81–89.
Winter, D., & Barenbaum, N. (2008). History of modern personality theory and research. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. The Guilford Press., 3–26.
York, T., Gibson, C., & Rankin, S. (2015). Defining and measuring academic success. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation. 1, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.7275/hz5x-tx03
Zhang, L. (2003). Thinking styles and the big five personality traits. Educational Psychology, 1, 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410120101
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
